New York Playgrounds

There’s an interesting set of data maps on Sociological Images, correlating the locations of playgrounds in New York with the local average earnings.  It depicts a play landscape that the writer found surprising – one where the poorest neighborhoods were also those wealthiest in playgrounds.

It’s not really that surprising.  Areas with greater numbers of poorer people also have a higher proportion of public housing (in which those poorer people are living) and public housing projects are obligated to provide play areas.  Areas with wealthy residents, where land value is high and new builds are led by private companies, don’t tend to ‘waste’ money on places that won’t make any.  There have been some exceptions, and on-going battles in gentrifying neighborhoods to save existing playgrounds.  Over time, however, awareness of children’s need for doorstep play might change, leading more mobile and wealthier parents to perhaps seek out homes with doorstep play offers.  This could perhaps leading to family-oriented new-build communities that offer space at a premium cost – but then, don’t they call those the suburbs?

Still, it’s very interesting to see how wealth and access to services can alter over a person’s lifetime.  When young, they might live walking distance from a number of places set aside for play, then grow up to find legal aid or healthcare offers thin on the ground.  It’s also easy to assume that a playground is all it takes for children to be happy, that the space itself is the provision, but anyone who’s seen an inner-city playground knows that they are often not for kids.  Their use by gangs as recruiting stations and offices, the training of fighting dogs on rubber-seated equipment, and rampant neglect for years on end mean that playgrounds can actually become among the most dangerous places for children to be.  Public playgrounds shouldn’t have to be staffed, but they do need to be looked after, and in places where local residents are unable, unwilling, or just rightly afraid, to take on that responsibility, many children start looking elsewhere to play.

In wealthier neighborhoods I would assume that a higher proportion of children are ferried to activities, rather than playing out, or perhaps being taken to places such as Central Park that are farther away, but much lovelier.  I don’t know as much about the play habits of children in wealthier families, though anecdotally I would assume that they have a much larger expectation of homework and academic achievement, that they spend more time indoors and in front of screens than those in poorer families.

The interesting thing though, is how different publicly expressed concerns are for these two groups of kids.  The chorus of television, newspaper and blog posts on these subjects seem to boil down to two key concerns:  that wealthier children spend too much time indoors and may be growing up to be dull, uninquisitive and apathetic to natural environments, and that poorer children are spending too much time unsupervised and may be growing up to be drug-addicted criminals who will break into the homes of journalists or start dating their daughters.  Sometimes, in my more cynical moments, I think that much of the support for playgrounds and youth clubs in poorer neighborhoods stems from fear of these children, rather than concern for their welfare.

Because surely, if public playgrounds were designed to help children play, to explore their worlds and build new ones, to express themselves and experiment with new ways of being, to make and lose friends, to take risks and get hurt and heal stronger than before, they would look very different to the tarmac paving and metal rings that we so often take for granted.  If they were not designed for containment and ‘blowing off steam’, these playgrounds would look less like the exercise equipment in prison yards.  If they were really designed for children, rather than adults, they would look (as the saying goes) more like parks than parking lots.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “New York Playgrounds

  1. I was just reading about the playgrounds in my new neighborhood (woot!). Seems like Prospect Park has all the good stuff, where as Ditmas Park (wealthy, etc.) has no good playground. I was surprised, but then again, the houses in Ditmas all have yards, whereas the houses along the south side of the park, where I now live, don’t….

  2. I’m totally perplexed by the fact that, as parents accumulate more money, they tend to create lives for their children that are less fun. Of course, for very low incomes, children’s lives are not good for reasons of safety, nutrition, etc., but I believe that the quality of children’s lives maxes somewhere around middle class.

    Parents like me who have a fair amount of money to spend on a house face a very difficult task in finding a nice one that’s also in a fun neighborhood for kids.

    1. I know! I think your comment and Sarah’s fit together actually – so many people construct physical and social defenses when they can afford to that some of them, like the white picket fence, have become a symbol of America. Play becomes a thing that happens in contained, owned spaces, where it can be watched and regulated, as parents give in to deeply-held and perhaps unexamined fears about safety and social contagion.

      Anecdotally, I’d say that some of the strictest parents I’ve seen are those who have recently changed financial circumstances and are not comfortable in their new position – either having moved into public housing where they’re afraid of other residents, or into more expensive areas where they’re afraid of what their neighbors will think of them.

      Either way, it’s the children who (as ever!) suffer the anxieties of the parents.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s